Indicators are what attackers leave behind. Stolen credentials are what they arrive with.
52 IOCs
ClingSTUN Turns Vulnerable Edge Devices Into Attacker Infrastructure
Threat Actors
Malware Families
Excerpt
ClingSTUN Turns Vulnerable Edge Devices Into Attacker Infrastructure Blog Home Company Marketplace The PolySwarm Blog Analyze suspicious files and URLs, at scale, millions of times per day. Get real-time threat intel from a crowdsourced network of security experts and antivirus companies competing to protect you. ClingSTUN Turns Vulnerable Edge Devices Into Attacker Infrastructure Oct 13, 2026, 1:55:06 PM / by The Hivemind Tweet Related Families: Mirai Executive Summary An…
Read the original report →Diamond Model
Adversary(34)
Infrastructure(1)
Capability(41)
Victim
Indicators of Compromise
Open the mindmap →52 indicators
| Type | Indicator | Confidence | Score | First Seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHA256 | dc892f5013edb0aa1e61e808511387373d8d120348b5be0929621d21e6e9946a | Medium | Score 53/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2023-1389 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2025-49704 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | 4fbd61cb9181ebbc4fe9a6e59d3c346dc00001da48d66bd890556fc6fad22b07 | Medium | Score 53/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | b90640b392827b4f2d280f6cf67860862953331917d42df23e1653a92f2f98ad | High | Score 85/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | 6581bf37184bb2db899b9893064d39dd314ea691adf3281cc0aa7e0a31e5138a | High | Score 86/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | 10d83c1748895361e07320f68d44d427b43cadd2cbffe0ab5e607ab03aec83da | High | Score 85/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2022-36553 | Medium | Score 51/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2022-30190 | High | Score 79/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | ec199c78c11040fd3127887222fd75a85e5797bf96aa691a117fdd83dd663d81 | Medium | Score 53/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2025-0994 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | 48962b3893f2c8261e32e6b95ea7d463d145a529a8b2a6c987dd979454405c73 | Medium | Score 53/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | 284e5ec8748f99fd1b8c331b699a5fe5fd4448bbaae0347a940f427f931c4d14 | High | Score 86/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2022-47986 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| IP | 124.163.212.119 | High | Score 58/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | 5c4e263546fb21f8fe8732789a5b6583eaa8ae11ebeef099462a7c9bf50e022d | High | Score 85/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2025-55182 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | 9391c6ad17aced1142607c0c623b18d86a7697cc483d204ffac94093e26b8068 | High | Score 85/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2021-3493 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2025-34035 | Medium | Score 51/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | e6e113783356446aef66e5296db45b244f318292af7cebc2a9bd76f095a95c4c | High | Score 85/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2023-34362 | High | Score 79/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | f49f45303cbfccee14ff193ac9608f860e6d616f08c0ecbef1ec44f7c863d7ec | High | Score 85/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | e4d12208789f36efc5a1ff765088fed95d6bb5972d1a804a4536fd42366797d4 | High | Score 86/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2025-3248 | High | Score 79/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2025-53770 | High | Score 79/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2022-31199 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | dfba6008a2c828a9cb62342aec53006ae05a60cb8d4c41c3fa216fd727e8c6a3 | High | Score 85/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | 2ed54e0f988a62039abed88f6394eb1e3d5ed931f0183556055417fb08844ecf | High | Score 85/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2021-21974 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2022-21894 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | 76692a23abe718b93e63edefd743971ec627c0cdf3778f856bd5ec88003deaa2 | Medium | Score 53/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | 121f2050e3c891b29565fd73451fff7ae60199c86eb8d79ec1eb1d9844578487 | Medium | Score 53/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2025-49706 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2023-46604 | High | Score 84/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2021-4034 | High | Score 79/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2024-23625 | Medium | Score 51/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | c1d8e2829ea63b9dc1cf2c3421a5093406adad4d6622e238376e78e908e0e6e8 | High | Score 85/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2022-26134 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2023-2868 | High | Score 79/100 | First seen |
| SHA256 | 48f9b72ce72ab7087794650d6eef10135345088384fbde1482f1c74a02b80302 | Medium | Score 53/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2024-3400 | High | Score 79/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2023-22518 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2024-21412 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2021-33044 | High | Score 79/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2026-21509 | High | Score 79/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2017-7921 | High | Score 79/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2024-7344 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2023-36025 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2025-53771 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2024-40766 | High | Score 80/100 | First seen |
| CVE | CVE-2025-21042 | High | Score 82/100 | First seen |
IOC Relationship Graph
Building graph…